Air travel is one of the main reasons for increasing air pollution these days. So restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people suggest that
air
travel
is one of the main culprits for escalating air
pollution
these days, and restricting air
travel
is the only possible way to control air
pollution
. While
air
travel
undeniably contributes to air
pollution
, it cannot be singled out as the sole culprit and its curtailment, while
tempting, presents an overly simplistic solution to a complex environmental challenge.
Firstly
, attributing air
pollution
solely to air
travel
fails to acknowledge the substantial cont
ributions
of other sectors. Ground transportation, particularly fossil-fuel-powered vehicles, remains a major source of emissions. Industrial activities, from energy production to manufacturing, Correct your spelling
tribulations
attributions
also
spew substantial pollutants into the atmosphere. Focusing solely on aviation misses the wider picture and risks neglecting crucial areas for emissions reduction. For instance
, investing in electric vehicles and public transportation infrastructure could yield far greater benefits for air
quality than solely limiting flights.
Moreover
, restricting air
travel
would impose significant economic and social consequences. Global connectivity, facilitated by air
travel
, fuels international trade, fosters cultural exchange and drives tourism-dependent economies. Imposing severe limitations on these air
-borne links could stifle economic growth, isolate communities, and hinder global collaboration in fields like medicine and research. For example
, restricting medical evacuation flights during a pandemic could drastically worsen its impact, highlighting the potential downsides of a blanket ban on air
travel
. Instead
of resorting to draconian measures, a comprehensive approach that promotes cleaner technologies and operational improvements within the aviation industry holds greater promise.
In conclusion, while
air
travel
's contribution to air
pollution
cannot be ignored, attributing it as the sole culprit and proposing its radical curtailment is a misguided approach. Focusing solely on restricting flights overlooks the wider canvas of air
pollution
sources and risks jeopardizing global connectivity and economic progress. A multi-pronged strategy that embraces cleaner technologies, operational improvements within aviation, and targeted efforts in other sectors offers a more effective path towards cleaner air
quality.Submitted by sejal.h on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay presents a comprehensive response to the task, addressing the main points and providing a balanced perspective. However, strengthening the conclusion by summarizing key points and reinforcing your stance would enhance the overall response.
coherence cohesion
While the essay maintains clear and logical structure throughout, the introduction and conclusion could be more tightly linked. Ensure that your introduction clearly states your stance, and the conclusion succinctly restates your main arguments and reinforces your position.
task achievement
Including more specific examples and data to support your arguments would make your points more convincing. Consider citing studies or statistics related to air pollution contributions from different sectors or the economic impact of air travel restrictions.
task achievement
The essay successfully provides a balanced argument, acknowledging the role of air travel in air pollution while also considering other significant contributors like ground transportation and industrial activities.
coherence cohesion
The logical flow of ideas is well-maintained, making it easy for the reader to follow your argument. Each paragraph builds on the previous one, contributing to a coherent overall structure.
task achievement
The use of specific examples, such as medical evacuation flights during a pandemic, effectively illustrates the potential negative consequences of restricting air travel.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.