Governments should focus their spending on public services rather than on the arts (eg. Music and painting). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that governments should prioritize public service funding over subsidies for the
arts
, including music and painting. I completely agree with this
statement, as public services
often have more direct and measurable effects on societies than the arts
, which should be funded by private companies.
First of all, public services
are likely to generate tangible, positive results on a social scale. The prioritization of public services
means that there are evidently increasing numbers of well-improved public facilities and infrastructure, like schools or hospitals, which eventually leads to higher literacy rates as well as
better healthcare systems, respectively. Those examples are clear indicators of practical success, which soon improves the living standards of all individuals regardless of background and income. By contrast
, although
the arts
have certain visible contributions to the national economy, their impacts are of less importance compared to the aforementioned effects of public works due to
their abstract and subjective features.
Secondly
, private firms should be the major investors in the arts
to reduce the pressure on the state’s budget. To be specific, governments primarily get their budget from taxes, competing from the incomes of private corporations, individuals and the prices of both domestic and imported products. However
, such
an enormous amount of money can be considered limited, only adequate for competing priorities, including public facilities for the military. Therefore
, the majority of arts
funding should be the responsibility of private companies with a strong interest in art and the ability to be flexible and innovate in their expenditures for advertisements and artists such
as composers or singers.
In conclusion, it appears to me that the arts
should receive less funding from governments than public services
because of their less essential impacts on the whole society and their suitability for private companies to alleviate government expenditures.Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay provides a clear stance and addresses all aspects of the prompt well. However, you can improve by adding more specific examples or statistics. This would further demonstrate your points and add depth to your essay.
coherence and cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. This will make your argument progression more seamless and enhance the overall flow of your essay.
task achievement
Consider refining your sentence structures to avoid repetition and to ensure clarity. For instance, some points about the arts' subjectivity could be better streamlined to avoid redundancy.
introduction and conclusion present
The introduction effectively sets up your argument by clearly stating your position. This helps in immediately establishing the context and focus of your essay.
logical structure
Your essay maintains a logical structure throughout, with each paragraph clearly supporting your main argument. This enhances readability and comprehension.
introduction and conclusion present
The conclusion succinctly summarizes your key points and reiterates your position, giving your essay a satisfying and clear ending.