Automated systems can replace labour, do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, automated

systems

have become incredibly sophisticated, integrating machines into various employment fields.

While

some worry that

this

activity can potentially replace human labour,

others

believe that automation

instead

complements human abilities. I wholeheartedly agree with the latter opinion, and

this

essay will explain why. First and foremost, self-operating

systems

beneficially affect certain job industries,

such

as engineering and customer service. Automated processes can be established for various tasks,

such

as coding, gathering customer data and even chatting.

For example

, most online shopping platforms implemented chatbots for communicating and assisting buyers with easy issues.

As a result

, with

this

automated aid, the operation of different companies becomes more productive and efficient, without completely replacing labour.

Additionally

, certain occupations are unable to exist without human interaction,

such

as teachers, actors, therapists and doctors. These jobs cannot be substituted with machines, as they participate in activities like building a connection with

others

, maintaining eye-to-eye contact, expressing empathy and kindness, and mimicking movements and gestures, which are impossible to achieve by robots and self-managing programs.

For instance

, if robots try to engage in teaching, students will not gain knowledge about how to build relationships with

others

providing kindness and sympathy. In conclusion, even though some argue that machines will take over employees, I truly believe that it is unlikely to happen. Most industries require human participation and collaborative work which is hard to do with self-regulated

systems

. These

systems

aid in attaining goals but

not

Add a missing verb

do not

show examples

fully replace workers as they are needed for monitoring processes and interacting with

others

.