Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Issues related to

education

in adolescents are frequently discussed these days. It is argued that full-time time

education

is preferred for kids until they reach at least 18 years old. I partially agree with

this

assertion and

this

essay will provide

further

examples and explanations to support my viewpoint. On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why children should receive fundamental

education

. Not only a wide range of basic knowledge can be shared as initial guidance for their daily life, but

also

students will be taught to spend their time in school under restrictions.

Furthermore

, they can expand connections through the campus's extracurricular activities. When they become adult, both hard and soft skills will be the foundation for their future profession.

For instance

, individuals who study in primary school and

then

move to top-tier universities may have better opportunities to grow in their career paths than uneducated people.

Conversely

, conservative full-time training can lead to limitations for a student who has a strong passion for a particular area.

This

highlights that descendant can focus on their preferred leisure activities after school,

while

many hobbies

such

as sports, art , and music require a ton of hours to practice.

For example

, young generation footballers should be trained in specific soccer campuses since childhood to ensure that they will become the top among other players. All things considered, I am of the opinion that young people should focus on full-time

education

as a main priority.

However

, the government and academic institutions should find the right balance between required subjects and free time slots for exploring.