Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some individuals

are of

Verb problem

apply

show examples

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

claim that the

protection

of wild

animals

should be ultimately inclusive to establish ecological security for all

species

. Others,

nevertheless

, believe that preservation efforts should only cover a select number of

animals

.

Although

both schools of thought hold merit, I agree more with the former perspective. On the one hand, protecting all wild

animals

could provide unprecedented benefits for the ecosystem. The expansion of the human population has intensified agricultural activities that devastate the wild habitats of

animals

.

Such

destruction displaces wildlife, resulting in endangerment or even extinction that destabilizes the core of human food chains. Eventually, the very agricultural systems that humans depend on would become less productive, leading to food scarcity and even starvation.

Thus

, comprehensive

protection

of all wild

animals

can alleviate these problems, ensuring ecological stability and the proliferation of society. The idealistic nature of

such

a measure,

on the other hand

, does not exclude it from the inherent problem of budgetary limitations. The

protection

of even one

species

entails massive financial investment that covers research and the restoration or re-establishment of habitats.

Consequently

, an absolutely inclusive approach that covers all

species

would be financially impractical and could drain resources needed for other societal developments. These constraints lead to the call for a more targeted approach that focuses on already endangered

species

, extending the viability of the preservation budget and potentially leading to a comparable outcome to broader efforts. In conclusion,

while

there are compelling arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that prioritizing

protection

based on the level of endangerment is the most pragmatic approach.

Although

the

ideal

Correct your spelling

idea

show examples

of protecting all wild

animals

is laudable and could help prevent ecological disruptions, financial constraints necessitate a more focused strategy. By concentrating resources on the most endangered

species

, we can ensure long-term commitment and effectiveness in conservation efforts