There has been an ongoing debate about whether healthcare should be free; proponents argue it would improve access to medical services,
while
opponents think that patients should cover their own fees. Linking Words
This
essay shall delineate both sides' arguments and put forth a balanced opinion.
On one hand, Linking Words
this
policy would no doubt allow patients to seek medical attention without the burden of hefty fees. Linking Words
As a result
, public Linking Words
health
would be improved as the sick could easily get their treatment from proper medical facilities Use synonyms
instead
of seeking dubious means to cure themselves. A no-fee policy Linking Words
also
limits intervention from private companies aiming to inflate prices for their own profits. Linking Words
For example
, Germany is often cited as a model of public Linking Words
health
excellence Use synonyms
due to
its universal healthcare.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the costs of healthcare would have to be covered one way or another. As Linking Words
such
, it is highly likely that governments would allocate taxpayer money to make up for Linking Words
such
fees - some say that Linking Words
this
is highly unfair Linking Words
due to
the uneven amount of tax each citizen has to pay.
Linking Words
To conclude
, both sides have brought valid points to the table. The supporting side has the upper hand in terms of medical accessibility, Linking Words
while
the critics are Linking Words
also
valid in wanting to maintain their personal benefits. Linking Words
However
, public Linking Words
health
is still the top priority. Use synonyms
Thus
, it is crucial to maximize medical access, either by removing all prices or minimizing them. Figuring out the best course of action is a task best left to Linking Words
health
experts and policymakers.Use synonyms