Some people think foreign visitors should be charged more than local person when they visit the cultural and historical attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's globalized world, the issue of whether foreign
visitors
should pay higher fees
than locals when visiting cultural and historical attractions is a topic of debate. This
essay will argue that while
there are valid arguments for both sides, the disadvantages of implementing differential pricing outweigh the benefits.
Advocates for charging higher fees
to foreign visitors
argue that it could help generate additional revenue for the preservation and maintenance of these attractions. Cultural and historical sites often require substantial funding for conservation efforts, and increased revenue from foreign tourists could supplement government budgets. Moreover
, some argue that higher fees
for foreigners can help mitigate the impact of tourism on local communities and infrastructure, ensuring that locals are not overly burdened by the influx of visitors
.
However
, there are several compelling reasons to oppose differential pricing. Firstly
, it may perpetuate a sense of inequality and discrimination among tourists, potentially leading to resentment and negative perceptions of the host country. Tourists, whether domestic or foreign, contribute to the local economy through spending on accommodation, transportation, and dining, and should ideally be treated equally in terms of access to cultural heritage.
Furthermore
, implementing higher fees
for foreigners could deter potential visitors
and diminish the attractiveness of a country as a tourist destination. Many travelers
seek to explore and appreciate the cultural richness of a country, and excessive costs may discourage them from visiting altogether. Change the spelling
travellers
This
could have adverse effects on the tourism industry and the broader economy, which often relies heavily on tourist spending.
In conclusion, while
the idea of charging foreign visitors
higher fees
at cultural and historical sites may seem advantageous for revenue generation and local resource management, the potential drawbacks in terms of fairness, economic impact, and international perception outweigh these benefits. Governments should focus on sustainable tourism practices that ensure equitable access for all visitors
while
managing the conservation and preservation of cultural heritage effectively. Therefore
, I strongly disagree with the notion of charging foreign visitors
more than locals at cultural and historical attractions.Submitted by msdedew10 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay provides a comprehensive response to the prompt and addresses both sides of the argument. However, incorporating more specific examples or data would strengthen your argument further.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is well-organized with a clear introduction and conclusion. Main points are logically structured and well-supported. However, ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs to maintain coherence.
task achievement
The essay provides a balanced view, considering arguments for both sides before stating a clear position.
coherence cohesion
The logical structure and flow of ideas make the essay easy to read and understand.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion effectively encapsulate the main points of the essay.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.