Governemts should spend more on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary world, transportation plays a crucial role in people's lives.

Although

some believe that road infrastructure demands comprehensive attention, others argue that governments should invest more funds in the

railway

sector.

Nonetheless

, I subscribe to the latter view, owing to the affordability and potentiality of the

railway

system. First and foremost,

trains

have been an affordable means of transport for decades. To elaborate on

this

, since

trains

cover long distances by burning diesel, commuting in

trains

costs less compared to any other mode of transport that operates on petrol or fuel.

For example

, in several world nations, where exorbitant commodities prohibit people from commuting in vehicles,

such

as buses or cars, more people opt to travel by train.

Thus

,the cost-effectiveness of the public railways appeals to

larger

Add an article

a larger

the larger

show examples

number of commuters.

In addition

, utilising railways for commute may

also

facilitate conserving the

environment

.

In other words

, not only do

trains

emit the minimum amount of gases in the atmosphere, but

also

have a reduced carbon footprint, creating a pollutant-free

environment

. To exemplify

this

, recently numerous affluent countries have been enhancing their

railway

project in order to preserve the

environment

.

Hence

, the eco-friendly feature of the

trains

should entice the governments to subsidies the

railway

domain of transport. To encapsulate, it can be concluded that railways are a remarkable means of transportation that enable commuters to travel at relatively cheaper prices

while

conserving the

environment

simultaneously, and,

therefore

, the governments should shoulder the

railway

networks in order to make them more convenient for public use.