Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to protect wild animal and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many argue that

organisations

spend excessive time and

resources

to preserve wildlife and bird species.

However

, personally, I disagree with

this

statement because I believe that

organisations

spend way less to preserve a century than they should.

To begin

with, some believe that the

organisations

excessively focus on wildlife rather than focusing on the development and improvement of infrastructure, they feel neglected by their concerned

authorities

.

Additionally

,

while

focusing on

animals

and birds, the government is ignoring the necessary development opportunities in the country.

For instance

, basic health facilities, local infrastructure, and necessary

resources

. They believe that

authorities

should focus on these things first before shifting them to

animals

.

On the contrary

, if viewed objectively, the

resources

given to wildlife and birds are still not enough to protect them, and management by

authorities

is not fulfilling their needs as they require,

authorities

are trusted to manage the development and resource management for humans and

animals

, and they are failing. In recent news and articles, they showcase that the government is neglecting humans and

animals

by not providing them with enough

resources

. Concerned

organisations

should realise that, in recent years, it has been observed that some endangered species are on the verge of going extinct

due to

global warming and deforestation. They should amend the necessary measures and understand the seriousness of

this

issue.

To conclude

, from the arguments and given examples, I strongly believe, proper management and balance are required by the government.

Hence

, the national budget should be utilised properly by the

authorities

and provide sufficient

resources

to both

animals

and humans and meet their necessary needs.