Nowadays, there is a proliferation of discussions about animal captivity.
Nevertheless
, some people consider that the animal relocating in one place is the extravagancy budgeting. I personally do not entirely accept Linking Words
this
, and I will explain why.
Linking Words
Firstly
, many forests or Linking Words
animals
' homes have changed to other functions. There are many woodlands were destroyed for city expansion. Use synonyms
Hence
, it can impact the Linking Words
animals
' loss of homes. Use synonyms
For instance
, Indonesia's government has a project to move the capital city from Jakarta to Kalimantan, which is the area of the new administrative city planned in the central forests. Linking Words
This
area needs to destroy the forests massively, and It Linking Words
gives
a significant contribution to the disappearing of animal habitats. Verb problem
makes
As a result
, Linking Words
it is clear that
relocating wildlife in an open-range zoo is very important for the sustainability of Linking Words
animals
.
Use synonyms
Secondly
, one of the reasons for the importance of animal sanctuaries is to prevent the animal from extinction. Some wildlife Linking Words
who
have experienced species disappearance, Correct pronoun usage
apply
such
as Orang Utan in Kalimantan. Linking Words
Besides
that, it can protect wildlife from illegal hunters, which is, as reports from some research, the increase of animal endangered caused by many animal killers illegally. Linking Words
Therefore
, to solve Linking Words
this
problem is making places like animal captivity.
Linking Words
To conclude
, I strongly disagree with some people who consider building zoo parks a waste of money because it is a significant benefit for Linking Words
animals
who are experiencing home loss and saves them from massive hunters. Use synonyms
Consequently
, it is recommended that building animal shelters can keep their survival.Linking Words
maqbul.mohammad.m