Some people think it is better for one single legal system throughout the world. Others say countries should have their own laws. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
While
some believe that all nations should impose a unified legal
system
, others contend that each country should have its own. In general, a single legal framework could provide benefits but
also
potentially cause disadvantages. Proponents of a single
system
of law presume that it would lessen illegal activities in society.
In other words
, a unified judicial
system
could ensure that individuals who commit crimes would be punished, regardless of age.
For example
, capital punishment would be imposed on all juvenile murderers because, in some countries,
such
as Korea, young offenders do not face any punishments for murder
due to
their age.
Additionally
, using an identical legal structure in every nation could promote economic growth. In simpler terms, it would shorten unnecessary procedures and paperwork related to international trade
as well as
cooperation.
Therefore
, if a legal framework could be used globally, it would help to control crime rates and develop the economy.
However
, if one law structure is promulgated worldwide, it could considerably erode a country’s national identity. Indeed, some countries have long-standing religious beliefs, making them outstanding among others.
For instance
, India is well-known for worshipping cows because Indians believe
this
animal embodies Mother Earth.
Consequently
, consuming cows is an illegal activity and blasphemy in India.
Furthermore
, one specific law for all countries might not be able to accommodate the diverse needs and values of different societies, potentially leading to tensions and conflicts.
Hence
, a single judicial
system
could adversely impact the culture and society of a country. In conclusion, a single-law
system
would help decrease crime rates and grow the economy, but it could
also
possibly eliminate a nation's unique customs and traditions. In my opinion, human beings should balance both approaches to maximize benefits.
Submitted by Mads on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
You've presented a well-structured and coherent essay. Ensure that each main point is clearly explained and elaborated upon, particularly ensuring all examples support your points sufficiently.
task achievement
For task achievement, maintain the clarity of your ideas and make sure each point is fully developed. Including more specific examples might bolster your arguments further.
introduction conclusion present
Your essay has a clear and effective structure, with a strong introduction and conclusion.
supported main points
Your main points are well-supported and you provide relevant examples that support your arguments effectively.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • legal system
  • global unity
  • consistency
  • human rights
  • trade regulations
  • environmental regulations
  • cultural differences
  • sovereignty
  • self-determination
  • feasibility
  • international business
  • transnational issues
  • legal traditions
  • compromise
What to do next:
Look at other essays: