Many scientific institutes conduct research on live animals. Some people regard it as cruel and unnecessary while others believe it is justified in the interest of human welfare. Discuss the two views and give your reasons. Give reason for your answer.
Throughout history,
experiments
conducted on living beings have raised concerns about whether they are actually effective and necessary. While
many people
regard this
as a vital key for the sake of science, I still oppose this
argument as animal testing should be banned.
There are compelling reasons why a number of people
believe in laboratory science, which involves testing on live animals
. This
is known to be using medicinal products, and performing surgeries on healthy household pets such
as hamsters, cats or dogs because these animals
can demonstrate instant reactions and are most similar to humans in terms of physical structures including bones, flesh and organs. Animal experiments
have shown the efficacy of new treatments before any human research will be allowed to be conducted. A prime example of this
is the identification of multiple underlying side effects like infertility, birth defects, toxicity and cancer-causing after conducting research in order to ensure safety.
However
, many people
stand against this
inhumane act and state their point that living beings can experience distress and suffer severe pain. Sometimes, experiments
on animals
can be inaccurate and irrelevant since animals
significantly differ from real humans on account of genetics. Various organisations such
as PETA and HSI have been advocating for the replacement of animal testing with many alternative methods including utilising technologies, 3D tissues and organs-on-chips to predict human responses to different treatments while
maintaining accuracy. By that means, I strongly agree that animal ethics should be praised and featured as well as
scientific purposes; therefore
condemn the justification of exploiting live animals
for research projects and human welfare.
While
the benefits obtained from animal experiments
are undeniable, the ethical and moral grounds should also
be considered respectively. It is understandable why people
defend scientific works on living beings since they ensure the safety and efficacy of medicines before applying to
humans. Correct pronoun usage
them to
On the other hand
, there are still many non-animal substitutes for medicinal testing that can pose the same accuracy and preserve animal rights.Submitted by hawtzvnq on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your essay effectively addresses both viewpoints on the topic, providing a balanced discussion. However, some sentences could be clarified for better task response. For instance, the sentence 'This is known to be using medicinal products, and performing surgeries on healthy household pets such as hamsters, cats or dogs...' can be rephrased for clarity and accuracy.
coherence cohesion
You have provided a logical structure in your essay, and your arguments flow well. However, consider breaking some longer sentences into shorter ones for better readability and coherence. Additionally, ensure all points are directly relevant to the main argument.
coherence cohesion
Your introduction and conclusion are well-defined, clearly presenting your stance on the issue.
task achievement
You successfully provide examples and supporting points that enhance your argument, such as mentioning specific organizations like PETA and HSI advocating against animal testing.