Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Environmental deterioration is severely increasing every day across the globe. Some experts indicate that dealing with

such

an issue should be a mutual responsibility between all governments,

while

others claim that each country has to solve its own environmental troubles. I believe that

such

a problem should be considered internationally and handled as a danger to humanity and the earth.

This

essay will present both viewpoints and consult some studies to illustrate my preference. On the one hand,

nature

issues pose a threat to all creatures on

this

earth especially to humans,

thus

; dealing with

such

matters should be hand-to-hand between all communities and

countries

. Advocates for

this

standpoint emphasize that problems

such

as climate change are 90%

due to

human

activities

and

therefore

, solutions must come from a point where all communities, governments, and organizations agree on restricted policies to face those problems. I find myself agreeing with

this

perspective primarily because international laws are more effective in controlling human

activities

towards

nature

, like deforestation, urban sprawling, and non-renewable energy industries.

In addition

to

this

, in 2022 the World Environment Organisation shared a report that revealed that disasters related to climate changes

such

as drought, wildfires, global warming, and floods have decreased by 35% in only 2 years during the Covid Pandemic which stopped the whole world and most of human

activities

especially industry.

On the other hand

, ecological concerns may be better to be solved regionally. Proponents of

this

point of view argue that it would be easier for each country to take on its own troubles and that global policies regarding

nature

may take a long time to be applied widely.

However

, the reason for my disagreement with

this

opinion is that most of the industrial

activities

-which are the biggest causes for ecological declines- are international which means that the process may be between two or more

countries

. Another reason is that sometimes,

activities

in some

countries

may lead to natural disasters in other parts of the world.

For example

, a study published by the Environmental Defence Fund demonstrated that global warming which is mostly related to human

activities

has led to a rise in temperatures in Antarctica by almost 3 degrees since 1950

although

there are no industrial or human actions in that area, but

due to

other

countries

' impacts. In conclusion,

while

national ecological policies may be faster and more flexible, international cooperation is a must regarding environmental health

due to

its efficiency. In light of the argument presented, globally considered guidelines towards

nature

emerge as a superior solution for saving the environment, especially when considering actual control of human

activities

.