Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Environmental deterioration is severely increasing every day across the globe. Some experts indicate that dealing with
such
an issue should be a mutual responsibility between all governments, Linking Words
while
others claim that each country has to solve its own environmental troubles. I believe that Linking Words
such
a problem should be considered internationally and handled as a danger to humanity and the earth. Linking Words
This
essay will present both viewpoints and consult some studies to illustrate my preference.
On the one hand, Linking Words
nature
issues pose a threat to all creatures on Use synonyms
this
earth especially to humans, Linking Words
thus
; dealing with Linking Words
such
matters should be hand-to-hand between all communities and Linking Words
countries
. Advocates for Use synonyms
this
standpoint emphasize that problems Linking Words
such
as climate change are 90% Linking Words
due to
human Linking Words
activities
and Use synonyms
therefore
, solutions must come from a point where all communities, governments, and organizations agree on restricted policies to face those problems. I find myself agreeing with Linking Words
this
perspective primarily because international laws are more effective in controlling human Linking Words
activities
towards Use synonyms
nature
, like deforestation, urban sprawling, and non-renewable energy industries. Use synonyms
In addition
to Linking Words
this
, in 2022 the World Environment Organisation shared a report that revealed that disasters related to climate changes Linking Words
such
as drought, wildfires, global warming, and floods have decreased by 35% in only 2 years during the Covid Pandemic which stopped the whole world and most of human Linking Words
activities
especially industry.
Use synonyms
On the other hand
, ecological concerns may be better to be solved regionally. Proponents of Linking Words
this
point of view argue that it would be easier for each country to take on its own troubles and that global policies regarding Linking Words
nature
may take a long time to be applied widely. Use synonyms
However
, the reason for my disagreement with Linking Words
this
opinion is that most of the industrial Linking Words
activities
-which are the biggest causes for ecological declines- are international which means that the process may be between two or more Use synonyms
countries
. Another reason is that sometimes, Use synonyms
activities
in some Use synonyms
countries
may lead to natural disasters in other parts of the world. Use synonyms
For example
, a study published by the Environmental Defence Fund demonstrated that global warming which is mostly related to human Linking Words
activities
has led to a rise in temperatures in Antarctica by almost 3 degrees since 1950 Use synonyms
although
there are no industrial or human actions in that area, but Linking Words
due to
other Linking Words
countries
' impacts.
In conclusion, Use synonyms
while
national ecological policies may be faster and more flexible, international cooperation is a must regarding environmental health Linking Words
due to
its efficiency. In light of the argument presented, globally considered guidelines towards Linking Words
nature
emerge as a superior solution for saving the environment, especially when considering actual control of human Use synonyms
activities
.Use synonyms
Submitted by wathiq.online22 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Your introduction was clear and engaging, setting the stage for your balanced discussion. Consider adding a brief outline of the main points you will discuss to strengthen it further.
coherence cohesion
Your essay maintains a logical structure and flows smoothly from one point to the next. Use more transition words like 'furthermore' or 'consequently' to enhance clarity between points.
task achievement
While your examples are relevant and specific, try to diversify the types of evidence you provide, perhaps incorporating more recent studies or statistical data to support your claims.
task achievement
Your argument was well-balanced, presenting both perspectives clearly before reaching a well-supported conclusion.
task achievement
You effectively used studies and reports to back your claims, particularly the examples related to the World Environment Organisation and the Environmental Defence Fund.
coherence cohesion
The essay had a strong logical structure, with clear introductory and concluding paragraphs and well-developed body paragraphs.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.