Some believe that a tax on companies should be introduced to reduce industrial pollution. Others believe that other measures should be taken to solve the problem. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

With the exponential progress of industrialisation, the environment has faced particular threats from factorial excess

waste

. A sizable number of people argue that the government should impose taxes on

companies

in order to minimize pollution,

while

others oppose

this

idea and call for alternatives to be taken.

This

essay will discuss the two sides and explain why I agree more with the latter view. On the one hand, environmental taxes work effectively as a measure to trace down

corporations

’

actions

. It is understandable why folks demand heavy taxation on

companies

since

this

will restrain

factory’s

Correct article usage

the factory’s

show examples

activities and oblige leaders to look for new ways to handle excess

waste

.

However

,

corporations

may suffer from financial constraints if the policy is implemented.

For instance

, a company must pay for hired

labor

Change the spelling

labour

show examples

, facilities, and ingredients;

therefore

, they might collapse under tariffs for unintended

waste

.

Additionally

,

corporations

can control their

waste

to just under the requirement to avoid paying taxes without taking actual

actions

. By that means, taxation might be the suitable solution to punish a company, not to reduce pollution.

On the other hand

, others believe that different measures should be considered to solve

this

urgent issue. To make sure

corporations

are taking practical

actions

, the government can send people to inspect

then

Correct word choice

and then

show examples

report the data.

By

Change preposition

In

show examples

this

way,

companies

will comply with the rules, take responsibility and stay disciplined since they do not acknowledge when they are supervised. Another solution

highlights

Correct pronoun usage

that highlights

show examples

the effort to protect the environment is enforcing factories to spare an amount of profits on habitat conservation.

This

can be seen in the UK where industries must spend 10% of their gains on biodiversity, which caters to the demand of reducing environmental contamination

as well as

ensuring a functioning economy with

corporations

as the backbone. In the denouement,

while

the importance of taxation is undeniable, it is better for punishments to be tailored based on one’s financial situation and environmental implications. In order to sustain a stable economy

as well as

reduce pollution, I strongly think that governments should impose alternative solutions

such

as inspection and expenses on habitat conservation so

companies

are aware of their activities and take practical

actions

.