If countries are serious about solving traffic problems, they should tax private cars very heavily and use the money to provide free or very cheap rail travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

If countries are serious about solving
traffic
problems, they should tax private
cars
very heavily and
use
the money to provide free or very cheap
rail
travel
. To what extent do you agree or disagree with
this
statement?
Traffic
congestion is a growing issue in many urban areas, and governments are constantly seeking effective solutions to address it. One proposed measure is to impose heavy taxes on private
cars
and
use
the revenue to subsidize
rail
travel
.
While
this
approach has potential benefits, it
also
presents several challenges. On one hand, implementing a heavy tax on private vehicles could effectively discourage their
use
. High taxes might prompt individuals to seek alternative modes of transport,
thus
reducing the number of
cars
on the roads and alleviating congestion. The revenue generated from these taxes could be invested in enhancing
rail
infrastructure, making it more attractive and accessible to the public. Affordable or even free
rail
travel
could encourage people to switch from driving to using trains,
further
mitigating
traffic
issues.
For instance
, cities with efficient public transportation systems, like Tokyo and Paris, experience less congestion compared to those heavily reliant on private
cars
.
On the other hand
,
this
approach may not be entirely practical or equitable. Heavy taxation could disproportionately affect lower-income individuals who rely on private
cars
for their daily commutes.
Additionally
, the implementation of
such
a tax might face significant public resistance, as many people value the convenience and flexibility of personal vehicles.
Furthermore
, the effectiveness of
this
strategy depends on the quality and coverage of the
rail
network. In areas where
rail
infrastructure is underdeveloped or inadequate, merely subsidizing
rail
travel
might not be sufficient to encourage widespread
use
. In conclusion,
while
taxing private
cars
heavily and using the revenue to fund affordable
rail
travel
could contribute to solving
traffic
problems, it is not a one-size-fits-all solution. A more balanced approach, incorporating improvements in public transport alongside other
traffic
management strategies, might be more effective. It is essential for policymakers to consider local contexts and ensure that measures are equitable and practical.
Submitted by niteshrayamajhi542 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Consider elaborating more on examples to clearly illustrate points and add depth to the argumentation. Specific examples strengthen the essay by providing concrete evidence for your claims.
task achievement
Maintain a comprehensive analysis by addressing potential counterarguments in more detail. While your essay acknowledges opposing viewpoints, a deeper examination of these aspects can enhance the discussion.
coherence cohesion
Ensure logical flow by using transitional phrases effectively to connect different sections and ideas within paragraphs. Although the coherence is strong, further refining transitions can improve the readability.
introduction conclusion present
Your introduction clearly sets the stage for the discussion and states the topic succinctly, which is essential for understanding the essay's direction.
introduction conclusion present
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points and reiterates the balanced stance, wrapping up the essay neatly and reinforcing your argument.
coherence cohesion
Your main points are well-supported and relevant to the topic. The use of examples like Tokyo and Paris adds value to your argument, showcasing a practical understanding.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: