Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have diverse opinions regarding whether animals should be used in various experiments.
While
some individuals consider animal experimentation to be immoral, I contend that necessary tests
on living creatures are acceptable.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that such
experimentation harms the well-being of these beings. For instance
, tests
are widely used in medical research. To test the effectiveness of new drugs, subjects are injected with various kinds of viruses, contracting numerous diseases they did not have before, which causes them to experience great suffering. Furthermore
, these experiments are prevalent in the cosmetics industry, which is even more unjustifiable. Unlike medicines that are directly related to human health, cosmetic products serve only personal preferences. Business people develop new cosmetics to make a profit, and individuals use lipsticks, eyeshadows, and other products to enhance their appearance.
Conversely
, I argue that necessary tests
on these organisms should not be prohibited, especially in medical research, for three key reasons. Firstly
, there are currently no alternative methods to using living beings; therefore
, researchers have no choice but to employ them in medical studies. Secondly
, research subjects such
as laboratory mice are not wild, thus
having almost no impact on biodiversity and the natural environment. Finally
, certain diseases currently have no effective treatments, and if researchers are not allowed to conduct these tests
, individuals who have these conditions will have no opportunities to recover their health or, even worse, their lives will be threatened.
In conclusion, although
testing on living beings is unfair and damages their welfare, we cannot prohibit essential experiments in specific fields until alternative methods are found.Submitted by 645119931 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs discussing both viewpoints, and a conclusion. This is a strong point, as it provides a clear flow of ideas for the reader.
task achievement
While your essay effectively discusses the two sides of the argument, it could benefit from a slightly more detailed explanation of each point. For instance, the moral aspect of animal suffering and its implications on society could be expanded further.
task achievement
You provided specific examples, such as medical and cosmetic testing, to support your points. This is very helpful in making your arguments concrete and relatable.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are well-written and summarize the main points effectively. Make sure to keep this clarity and conciseness while maintaining depth in your discussion.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is very well-organized, which makes it easy to follow the argumentation.
task achievement
You provided relevant specific examples which help illustrate and support your points effectively.
task achievement
The ideas are clear and comprehensive, covering both views and providing your opinion concisely.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!