Both government investment in public transport systems and reductions in public transport ticket prices would help to reduce transport pollution greatly. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
One of the most pressing challenges we face as a society is
pollution
.
While
there are various sources of contamination, vehicle emissions, mainly CO2, rank at the top of the list. Some argue that government investment in mass transit systems and lower ticket prices could effectively mitigate
this
issue. I wholeheartedly agree; initiatives aimed at creating eco-friendly public
transportation
systems and promoting their
use
at reduced prices would likely encourage more individuals to opt for public transit
instead
of relying on their cars. Currently, in most cities, commuting relies on personal vehicles that typically run on oil or diesel, releasing toxic gases into the atmosphere daily.
However
,
this
situation can improve if governments adopt policies that promote the development of efficient public
transportation
systems using renewable energy and offer comprehensive city coverage to serve a more significant portion of the population.
For example
, in Amsterdam, to combat air
pollution
affecting local rivers, the Town Hall replaced downtown vehicles with electric trains rather than fossil fuel-powered ones. They
also
introduced free parking for commuters who left their cars near the train station.
This
initiative was highly successful, demonstrating a significant decline in
pollution
levels.
Consequently
, other cities are beginning to replicate
this
model. Another critical factor that could contribute to
this
goal is reducing public
transportation
fares. The objective is to increase daily ridership. Creating incentives for using public transport is essential, and price reduction is an effective strategy.
For instance
, in cities like Calgary, there is a free fare zone for the train, allowing people to
use
the service without charge.
This
zone is situated downtown, encouraging people to park their cars and
use
the train for their commutes.
This
example supports the notion that lowering ticket prices boosts the
use
of public
transportation
, thereby decreasing
pollution
. In conclusion, it is evident that when local or national governments implement public policies aimed at improving public conveyance with affordable pricing,
pollution
levels tend to decrease significantly.
Submitted by easocadaguica on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
You have effectively presented a clear and comprehensive response to the question, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the topic.
coherence cohesion
The logical structure of your essay is strong, with well-organized paragraphs that make your argument easy to follow.
task achievement
You have included relevant and specific examples that help to illustrate and support your main points.
coherence cohesion
Your essay includes a clear introduction and conclusion, which encapsulates the main arguments effectively.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • sustainable transport
  • carbon footprint
  • mass transit
  • subsidization
  • fare reduction
  • environmental impact
  • urban planning
  • public policy
  • commuter behavior
  • infrastructural development
  • economic efficiency
  • equitable access
  • lifestyle shift
  • congestion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: