Money has always been a controversial topic when it comes to every aspect of life, and
healthcare
is not excluded.
While
some
people
believe that medical bills should be
of Change preposition
show examples
the government’s responsibility
instead
of individuals,
the Correct article usage
show examples
others think that
people
should pay the
costs
themselves. From my perspective, I am more convinced of the latter opinion. In what follows, both views will be discussed and I will give relevant evidence to substantiate my stance.
On the one hand, it is argued by some that
healthcare
should be free for everyone. Admittedly,
this
statement is valid to
certainAdd an article
show examples
extent. In fact, everyone has the right to get access to available
healthcare
innovations.
However
, considering the significant
costs
in many developed countries
such
as The US or Canada, poor
people
have difficulty gaining proper treatment.
As a result
, the idea of free medical services seems to provide humans, especially underprivileged ones, with more opportunities to overcome their illnesses.
Furthermore
, medical bankruptcy could be prevented if a universal
healthcare
policy is established. What I mean is that many individuals have to file for bankruptcy since they
could notWrong verb form
show examples
afford the medical debt.
Therefore
, they hope that
a Remove the article
show examples
free
healthcare
could rule out, or at least minimize the considerable
costs
of medical treatment.
On the other hand
, I myself believe that universal
healthcare
causes more problems rather than helps solve the existing ones. First of all, free medical treatment would raise
costs
for the federal government and, in turn, taxpayers. To illustrate, the government’s budget is limited and it could not cover all expenses from medical care.
As a consequence
, the authorities would have to establish new financing mechanisms
such
as introducing new taxes or issuing debt to maintain their budget, which unfortunately have no difference from paying medical
costs
at all.
Secondly
, free
healthcare
may create inaquedacy to meet increased demand from patients. In fact, when
people
have to pay for their medicine, the demand is controlled which guarantees the supply of doctors and equipment.
In contrast
, a single-payer system would result in an unprecedented disparity between demand and supply, resulting in
riskAdd an article
show examples
of bribery or corruption as well.
In conclusion,
while
universal medicine might have certain positive impacts on humankind, it still lacks the ability to overshadow the problems it may cause.
Although
it sounds ideal when
people
do not have to pay for their treatments, I think practicality should be taken into consideration first.