More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development?

With the growing population of cities, more urban

dwellers

have to live in compact

houses

with no outdoor

spaces

. In my opinion, despite certain drawbacks,

this

tiny

house

movement is more associated with benefits to urban

residents

and society as a whole. On the one hand, I must admit that living in a tiny

house

is disadvantageous with respect to city

dwellers

'

wellbeing

Correct your spelling

well-being

show examples

. Large living

spaces

have been

proved

Correct your spelling

proven

show examples

to be instrumental in helping inhabitants, especially children, nurture their imagination and creativity. The young generation raised in tiny

houses

could be deprived of chances to realize their full

creativity

Replace the word

creative

show examples

potential.

Besides

that, negative impacts are

also

on adult

residents

. Dealing with heavy

workload

Fix the agreement mistake

workloads

show examples

and exorbitant living costs, adults in urban areas usually have a stressful life which is not alleviated but aggravated when going back to their stuffy rooms. Feeling cramped could be unpleasant and unbearable for some people, which could constantly trap them in negative feelings. Aside from the drawbacks mentioned above, I firmly believe that

this

tiny

house

movement should be encouraged because of its greater benefits associated with urban planning, more savings and home control. With regard to the former, living in compact

houses

is probably the best answer to the overpopulation problem so far since it can provide more living

spaces

. As far as savings are concerned, by living in

this

condition, urban

residents

can lower their housing costs

such

as rental fees and

house

maintenance costs. Safety could

also

be added to the list as small

houses

are easier to be controlled and supervised.

This

choice of accommodation is optimal for inhabitants in densely populated cities like Hong Kong or Singapore. In these places, the

dwellers

could afford their expenses and be shielded from burglaries and crimes more than those living in huge

houses

in Chicago in the US. In conclusion,

although

the downsides to citizens' wellbeing are considered, living in

houses

with limited

spaces

seems to be more beneficial to city

dwellers

and communities as it could resolve problems related to urban settings, cost savings and

residents

' safety