The most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
Since the
development
of science
, people
's life
quality has improved rapidly. Therefore
, some people
believe that this
is the ultimate purpose of scientific research
. However
, I fully disagree with this
opinion.
Review history, it is painless to clarify that science
follows academic intrinsic behaviors
, Change the spelling
behaviours
such
as independent analysis, which means scientists prefer to research
and rely on their specialties
and interests, in order to recognize the world objectively. In fact, since the complexities of the frontiers of Change the spelling
specialities
science
, it is challenging to identify whether a scientific project is beneficial to human life
or not. For example
, Einsten's theory refreshed people
's perspective of the physical world, and brought a series of technical innovations, but also
accomplished the development
of nuclear weapons. So, if we merely concentrate on the morality of science
, Einsten's research
should be forbidden at that time, which is a wrong conclusion apparently. Therefore
, treating improving life
's quality as the pure motivation of science
is irrational and unrealistic, because it violates the spirit of science
.
Undoubtedly, people
's lives are related to the development
of science
, but this
relevance is not direct. Generally, scientific research
requires massive financial and time costs with the uncertainty of consequences, resulting in scientific discoveries are
unexpected usually. Meanwhile, many results of the Correct pronoun usage
that are
research
are likely to be illustrated as theoretical possibilities, which means they are unable to practice in applications in the short term. Hence
, a better way to describe this
fact is that most scientific research
is ineffective in enhancing life
's quality. Therefore
, it is axiomatic that aiming science
at helping people
's lives is ludicrous.
In conclusion, science
runs on its inner logic and rules, and even though its development
could be advantageous to people
's lives, it should be functional in exploring natural laws.Submitted by Timothy on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear position on the topic and offers some relevant examples to support arguments. However, some points could be further elaborated for more clarity and stronger support.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear central idea and that all sentences contribute to developing that idea further. This will strengthen the coherence and cohesion of the essay.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, which provides a solid framework for the overall structure.
task achievement
You have presented a clear stance on the topic, which is maintained throughout the essay.
task achievement
The use of individual examples like Einstein's theory helps illustrate your points effectively.