Some people think that technological development have positively affected the say we live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Modern technological developments have considerably contributed to human civilisation. I strongly disagree with

this

allegation because it has

also

endangered the

environment

, and some of the developments,

such

as nuclear weapons, severely and consistently threaten our lives. The amelioration of technologies for the past 200 years has often corresponded with the destruction of the

environment

and, by extension, the earth.

That is

to say, human beings have obtained a technological breakthrough by cutting down a large number of trees, extracting minerals, and other behaviours. The usage of petrol, primarily

due to

the invention of the automobile, is

also

responsible for the enormous amount of CO2 emission, which inevitably damages the

environment

.

For instance

, scores of intellectuals are concerned that the current unsustainable development may cause irreversible damage to nature, rendering the earth inhabitable in the near future.

Also

, several technological inventions, namely nuclear weapons, are arguably a peril to our society. As abhorrent records in Hiroshima and Nagasaki denote, the destruction caused by the bombs not only annihilated thousands of citizens but

also

entailed diseases related to radiation.

This

acute threat is still omnipresent in the international system.

For example

, the number of those weapons currently exceeds 5000, which can easily generate enough magnitude to destroy our civilisation multiple times. I firmly disagree with the statement asserting that recent technological improvements have positively affected our lives.

This

is

due to

that

Correct determiner usage

the

show examples

fact that technologies we utilise to maintain our society are mostly established upon the sacrifice of the

environment

.

Also

, a few of the technological products have been constant threats to our survival.