Long distant flights uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment. We should discourage non-essential flight rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

It is argued that
aeroplanes
introduce more polluted stuff and consume more
fuel
than
cars
, so we must limit flights and
then
cut back on the use of
cars
.
This
essay totally disagrees with that statement because
cars
are way more than
aeroplanes
and
cars
of sky are the faster and safer than other
transport
.
Firstly
, we must take heed that in the world
cars
are the most distributed
transport
and they take the biggest role in polluted areas around the Earth. They consume
fuel
and dangerous smoke from
this
transport
is dangerous for all plants and animals, including humanity.
For example
, scientists from China said that we must buy more electronic
cars
because car
fuel
causes us huge problems and they did not mention other
transport
. We can conclude from
this
that
cars
are more dangerous than
aeroplanes
.
Secondly
, we can not just take and decline flights on
aeroplanes
, because they are very essential and
this
is the only way to deliver people from one continent to another.
For instance
, if we pay attention to statistics, we can say that it is the fastest way to go somewhere, and
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
safer than
cars
have a huge number of emergencies around the world. In conclusion, some say that flights must decrease in numbers because they consume more
fuel
than
cars
and pose a threat to nature, but I do not agree with
this
because
aeroplanes
can be faster and safer, and they
also
have fewer pollution effects on nature than other transports.
Submitted by Kawasaki on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Your essay addresses the prompt and presents a clear opinion, but it could benefit from a more balanced discussion. Consider acknowledging the opposing viewpoint to strengthen your argument.
task achievement
The main ideas are clear, but some points could be developed further for better comprehension. Adding more specific and detailed examples could help illustrate your points better.
coherence cohesion
Your essay is logically structured with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, work on creating smoother transitions between ideas to improve the flow.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph has a clear main idea supported by relevant details. Some of your points could be more clearly connected to the main argument.
coherence cohesion
You have a clear introduction and conclusion, which helps in presenting your argument clearly.
task achievement
Your essay contains relevant main points that address the task and demonstrate a good understanding of the topic.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • carbon footprint
  • emission reduction
  • fuel efficiency
  • sustainable travel
  • global warming
  • carbon emissions
  • green technology
  • public transportation
  • electric vehicles
  • environmental impact
  • non-essential travel
  • economic benefits
  • tourism industry
  • global trade
  • sustainable alternatives
  • carbon offsets
  • renewable energy
  • climate change
  • eco-friendly
  • environmental awareness
What to do next:
Look at other essays: