It is argued that till the age of 21, all individuals must be in full-
time
education. The advantages to Use synonyms
this
are that students will be able to enhance their knowledge and skills, and it will help in their personal development. Linking Words
However
, the disadvantages are that it may come with a financial burden and Linking Words
also
result in a delayed entry into the workforce.
As the years of university Linking Words
time
increase, the Use synonyms
time
received to completely hone the technical know-how and skills Use synonyms
also
increases. Graduates will Linking Words
then
come out of college with advanced knowledge and technical abilities, making them more competitive in the job market. Linking Words
Moreover
, extended schooling encourages personal growth, critical thinking, and maturity, leading to well-rounded individuals. Linking Words
For example
, a boy graduating at 21 is more mature to take on the corporate world than someone graduating at 18.
But, longer school Linking Words
time
can be taxing on some families, as they may not be able to afford it, eventually leading to increased student debt. Use synonyms
This
will be especially true for families with a low annual income. Linking Words
Additionally
, the Linking Words
time
to get the first full-Use synonyms
time
job might Use synonyms
also
be delayed, which could impact lifetime earnings. Linking Words
For instance
, graduates tend to receive employment offers by 18 or 19 years of age, allowing their families to start becoming financially dependent on their children's salaries. If Linking Words
this
is delayed, Linking Words
then
parents might have to take money out of their lifetime savings to support the school fees for a couple of years more.
In conclusion, mandating people to continue with their education till 21 will benefit their personality development and more subject matter expertise. But, it comes with drawbacks like late employment opportunities and monetary challenges.Linking Words
majumdarnilesh21