Countries with along average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree

In recent years many of the population believe there is a strong correlation between long average working

time

and rising in

economy

among countries. In

this

essay, I will express my view of aspects in detail. On the one hand, the implementation of the labour force will increase the

economy

in both direct and indirect ways.

Additionally

, the existence of employees for a long

time

will raise production which lead to an increase in the

economy

directly.

For instance

, by taking a glance at these countries which have high economies we found they exploit the vast number of employees and distribute the

time

work between them throughout the day.

On the other hand

, some residents argue and deny any relation between increasing

time

spent on work and productivity.

Firstly

, expert and disciplined employment could assist in raising output without any offer hours.

In contrast

, inexperienced people and employees spend a long

time

achieving one task a day.

For example

, China was one of these countries which reduced their working

time

and surprisingly their

economy

climbing over these years. In conclusion, I completely disagree with that, and I believe focusing on skills and intelligence for employment and motivating Human resources management to be concerned about the ability of people rather than increasing their hours could improve the productivity and

economy

of cities.