Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

In recent years, most

people

have debated between punishments that are appropriate for each type of criminal. Some

people

believe it should be fixed

while

some

people

argue. Personally, I insist that it should be adjusted to appropriate the suitcases of criminals.

However

, support will be illustrated in both sides of view in the following paragraphs: First and foremost, in heavy

cases

, some circumstances are out of control and simply to protect themselves. The

court

needs to consider components of

cases

such

as motivations and the environment of situations.

For instance

, there are tremendous criminal

cases

in Thailand, some murderers unintentionally commit a crime but they simply protect themselves by violence and they need to be imprisoned their whole lives.

In contrast

, rape and murder by the previous considering, they should not have a chance to be clement. The government and the

court

should be fixed legally to be more heavy which will prevent their reputation.

On the other hand

, If the

court

needs to adapt laws to circumstances, It will make a lot of mistakes–leading to the standard of laws being destroyed. It is difficult to examine the motivation of

people

when they break the law.

For example

, there have been many

cases

in the past around the world in which the

court

and authorities can not sum up the

cases

because they lack clearing evidence and the

cases

are changed to mysteries. As I mentioned, there are huge effects to suspect if they do not have the intention to do wrong. Especially in the heavy

cases

.

However

, there are some points that need to be considered before changing the law.

Therefore

, the government should carefully address it.