Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some would argue that people who are criminals should be punished because they have broken the law, these penalties should be fixed for for each

crime

.

while

some others say

this

should be considered

this

Correct determiner usage

a

show examples

crime

for the motivation and the circumstances. I think that setting a single penalty for each type of

crime

will be a long process. First of all, one reason for giving fixed punishment, is because it organizes

penal

Correct article usage

the penal

show examples

system,

furthermore

Add a comma

furthermore,

show examples

this

will be consistent for everyone,

these

Correct word choice

and these

show examples

circumstances provide a solution with strong laws,

In addition

, these acts can motivate them a be aware and prevent people from committing dangerous crimes. Because these crimes have established punishment for each action.

For example

, if one person robbers a bank, will be condemned for 7 years, and another person

who

Correct pronoun usage

apply

show examples

steals a shop, obviously it's supposed that it will be the same penalty because it is the same

crime

, but different place.

On the other hand

, it would be

that

Correct word choice

apply

show examples

those who prefer to consider the individual circumstances and motivation of the

crime

, as is the case of the serial killer who kills for pleasure,

furthermore

of structural plan that they have already made previously.

while

a person who kills another in self-defence can not be convicted for the same act. In my opinion, both statements have the same purpose, I prefer to choose a permanent punishment, because whatever the reason is a

crime

.