Some people think that countries should limit the amount of food that they import and mainly eat products from their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some argue that people should eat more local
food
and governments should restrict the amount of imported food
. I generally agree with this
idea due to
possible international conflicts and economic effects, but there are some drawbacks as well including high costs of some items
.
First and foremost, relying on trading threatens the stability of dietary life. More specifically, nobody can precisely predict a future conflict with other countries such
as wars, which can lead to stopping trading completely. If some important ingredients are dependent on these countries, their scarcity would be a serious issue that endangers our daily lives. Recently, China was against Japan's attitude about releasing water from nuclear power stations and stopped importing any seafood. This
affected a number of restaurants in China and they have to find alternatives. Therefore
, countries should not rely on any important products from foreign nations.
Moreover
, by developing the national primary industry including farming and fishing, the economy of the country is expected to be stimulated and improve the quality of life. As fewer overseas competitors exist due to
this
remedy, more products produced within the country would be purchased, so producers would earn greater income. Consequently
, more items
are produced in better quality and the economy as a whole is stimulated.
However
, there are disadvantages to this
solution. For instance
, there are some items
that can be made at a high cost only. For example
, flour is one of the fundamental ingredients as it is used for various foods such
as cakes and bread. On the other hand
, it requires a vast farmland and thus
it is difficult to make it in Japan. Hence
, flour produced in Japan tends to be much more expensive than foreign ones like the one from the US. This
leads to more food
expenses and a worse lifestyle.
In conclusion, although
some items
can be produced at a high cost, the overall
benefits outweigh its drawbacks because of the food
security and the economic effect.Submitted by nanakoueda0726 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While your ideas are well-supported, consider providing more varied examples to illustrate your points further and enhance the depth of your arguments.
coherence cohesion
Strive for smoother transitions between paragraphs to ensure that the progression of ideas feels more natural.
task achievement
The essay provides a strong and clear response to the prompt, addressing both benefits and drawbacks of the issue.
task achievement
Relevant and specific examples are used to support the main points, such as the situation between China and Japan, which strengthens the argument.
coherence cohesion
The essay follows a logical structure with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, making it easy to follow.