Some people believe that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime. Other, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your opinion

It is argued whether the punishments for any criminal act should be based on the motives behind it and the circumstances involved or should be pre-decided for each category.
While
defining punishment for each kind of
crime
seems logical from the aspect of a judiciary, I believe it is more important to stay flexible and look at the degree of the
crime
before deciding the punishment in order to be fair to the victim. On the one hand, it makes sense for the legislative authorities to assign punishments for each type of
crime
. Without
this
bifurcation, things may look bizarre. It would give a hierarchical view to the public; minor thefts would get fined or a terminal jail,
whereas
terrorist activities like the one which happened on 9/11 would lead to direct encounters or life imprisonment.
On the other hand
, looking at the degree of the act is extremely important. Consider a sexual assault
for instance
. Within
this
category, there are heinous sub-categories which lead to grave mental and physical damage to the victims and their families. In
such
cases, it is only fair that the assaulters are subjected to forms of punishment worse than usual. The other way around is
also
true. If a minor theft was conducted by a teenager from a poor family out of starvation,
then
it should not be fined like other critical thefts, infact ways must be discovered to instil value among them and provide for resources.
For example
, in 2014, an incident by the name of “Nirbhaya” became infamous globally because of the nature of the gang assault committed against a college student. People came out on the streets protesting and demanding maximum terms for the convicts, which ultimately led to a change in law for
such
crimes. In conclusion,
although
assigning the punishments as per the type of offence may look logical, I firmly believe it is only fair to the victims and their families that the situation, cause, and degree of the
crime
is looked into.
Submitted by man3meet4 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Provide more specific examples and references to real-world laws or cases to strengthen arguments.
coherence cohesion
Ensure consistent use of tenses and avoid small grammatical inaccuracies.
task achievement
Clarify some of the arguments further, for instance, explaining why a fixed punishment system may lead to better deterrence or why flexibility is necessary.
task achievement
The essay clearly addresses both views of the argument, offering a well-rounded discussion.
coherence cohesion
Strong introduction and conclusion, contributing to a coherent essay structure.
task achievement
The use of the 'Nirbhaya' case adds a significant real-world context to support the argument for flexible sentencing.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: