Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and against keeping animals in zoos

The usage of

zoos

as an alternative to a natural environment has stimulated an ongoing debate about whether the construction of

zoos

has to be continued or not.

This

essay will examine both perspectives, ultimately stating that it is definitely beneficial to build

zoos

in a natural environment.

To begin

with, a

zoo

can be regarded as a place that contributes to a nation's economy. Not only taking part in the wealth of a country, it

also

creates job opportunities for the residents around the

zoo

. To exemplify, it is a good idea for us to hire a lot of people to be the animal keepers, staff, or receptionists in the

zoo

. It is

also

important to note that

zoos

are an area where some species of

animals

can be kept safely,

hence

bringing a knock-on effect of reducing the likelihood of extinction of some species. Seeing from the perspective of the

animals

, it is pressuring for them to live in a place created by human, not in their own natural habitat.

For example

, fishes that

initially

have the freedom to explore the wide area of an ocean, are now restricted to an area not wider than a kilometre square.

This

means that

animals

do not possess the chance to move around in the place they wish. The budget to build a

zoo

is

also

considerably high, knowing that it is not enticing for people to visit a

zoo

that does not provide manifold species of

animals

. In conclusion, building

zoos

can bring some advantages and downsides to the environment around them. That being said,

this

essay asserts that constructing

zoos

would bring a lot of positive impacts that outweigh its negativity.