Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some
people
argue that the
government
should invest in
railways
instead
of
roads
. I strongly agree with
this
statement.
This
essay will examine my views and justify the proposed stance. To commence, numerous reasons contribute to why spending money on
railways
is indispensable. First and foremost,
trains
are instrumental forms of public
transportation
for individuals who live in urban cities, as these
people
often use the train as a primary public
transportation
for commuting on daily occasions.
Hence
, investing sufficient amounts of money can develop a robust mode of
transportation
to accommodate those
people
's needs.
Additionally
, with efficient public
transportation
such
as
trains
, the number of public
transportation
users can surge dramatically, as many
people
will opt for
trains
over private vehicles.
Consequently
,
such
efficient
trains
can significantly decrease pollutant levels, enhancing the air quality and mitigating the extensive spread of noxious gas
emission
Fix the agreement mistake
emissions
show examples
on the street from private vehicles.
Conversely
, despite the advantages of spending on
railways
, those who disagree have their own viewpoints. The proponents of
this
argument believe that the
government
should invest in road infrastructure, as a pragmatic solution to alleviate traffic congestion is to expand the
roads
.
For instance
, wider
roads
can facilitate more individuals on the street, reducing the level of traffic congestion.
However
, if the
government
constructs
roads
it will not automatically stop the traffic congestion, as there will be more and more cars occupying the
roads
.
In addition
, the investment needed is possibly more because the
government
has to clear the area to buy the land.
To conclude
, I firmly agree that the
government
should allocate a tremendous amount of money towards railway development, as investing in
railways
poses notable benefits
such
as bolstering public
transportation
and declining levels of pollutants. I believe through spending on
railways
, the
government
can establish a comprehensive public
transportation
system for its
people
.
Submitted by rasendrya.hafiz on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Consider providing more specific examples or data to strengthen arguments. While you mention urban cities and traffic congestion, giving exact instances or statistics can add credibility.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that transitions between paragraphs maintain a smooth flow by varying transitional phrases. You've used 'To commence' and 'Conversely' effectively; consider adding more varied connectors.
task achievement
The essay provides a strong introductory statement followed by a clear position, laying a solid foundation for the arguments.
task achievement
You effectively examine both sides of the argument which enhances the depth of your response.
coherence cohesion
The logical structure of the essay is commendable with each paragraph building on the argument presented.
coherence cohesion
You have presented a well-rounded conclusion that reiterates your stance and provides a final perspective.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: