The restoration of old building in major cities in the world costs enormous government expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued, that the

government

should use

money

to contrast new infrastructures and housing societies

instead

of expending

this

money

to restore the old

buildings

in the

cities

.In

this

essay, I will discuss both aspects

as well as

my opinion regarding

this

is that

money

should be used for the development of new houses and roads.

To begin

with, the first aspect, is many countries prefer to rebuild the old

buildings

because of their culture and heritage. These

buildings

are the visual records of many

cities

, reminding us how these

buildings

played a vital role in establishing

cities

.

while

using

government

expenditures to restore them is considered beneficial.

For example

, the restoration of Pakistan's famous historical place Shahi Killa was completed in 2016,

on the other hand

demolishing old

buildings

means that our culture and tradition of

cities

will disappear,

additionally

, it helps communities from losing an important part of their history.

Therefore

it is important to use

money

to preserve old heritage.

On the other hand

, some individuals think that public expenditures should be used to build new infrastructure like roads, motorways and houses.

However

there are some countries in the world that have poor economies because they use public spending in the wrong way,

instead

of restoring an old building, authorities should pay attention to making their people's lives trouble-free.For it, they should provide new facilities

for instance

, It can seen that in China infrastructure spending has reached 7% of the GDP. So focusing on old architecture

government

should focus on new developments

To sum up

, both aspects have their uses and negative effects

hence

I strongly agree that the

government

should construct new structures.