Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than local when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country. To what extent do you agree with this view?

In recent years, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of individuals discussing issues related to the travel industry and its impact on various aspects of the market system. Some argue that international visitors should be subject to higher rates compared to the native population,

while

critics strongly oppose

this

view, contending that the travel market will be negatively affected by

this

approach. In

this

essay, it will be argued that imposing higher fees on foreigners than on inhabitants has indeed become essential for enhancing both economic growth and the preservation of cultural sites.

To begin

with, there is an argument to be made that sightseers are often considered to have a significantly higher spending capacity compared to citizens, and they should contribute more financially to support the market system and conserve cultural landmarks.

For instance

, In countries like Egypt, tourists are subjected to additional tariffs to enter historical sites, which helps fund preservation efforts.

For

this

reason, it's evident that applying tariffs to non-residents can provide essential funding for maintaining and improving cultural attractions without burdening local residents. Another aspect to consider is that the increased taxes on international guests are being used to generate revenue, which will be allocated to local development projects and the improvement of public infrastructure in the long term.

This

perspective is supported by the example of Bhutan, where leisure levies are high, and earning is used for development projects

such

as building schools and healthcare facilities.

Thereafter

, it is evident that the additional income generated from the sightseer's duties is being reinvested in the local community and is set to be distributed to enhance the

overall

experience for both non-residents and residents. In conclusion,

while

the importance of supporting the local economy is evident

due to

the potential for economic growth, the significance of preserving cultural heritage cannot be overstated. Enhancing the benefits of setting higher rates for overseas tourists is essential for the sustainable improvement of societies and the protection of their cultural and historical areas.