It is argued that the ideal method for improving roadway safety is to require drivers to undergo an annual driving examination.
This
essay will disagree with that view and discuss how Linking Words
such
a requirement causes inconvenience for drivers and imposes high costs on the traffic department.
The necessity for frequent appointments Linking Words
due to
driving tests forces motorists to waste time and money on retaking an exam. Linking Words
Moreover
, traffic rules remain largely consistent, making it unnecessary to repeatedly verify a driver's understanding of these regulations. Linking Words
Instead
, the focus should be on implementing efficient ways to penalize those who violate the rules. Linking Words
For example
, Singapore's stringent fines for traffic violations effectively reduce the incidence of car accidents, eliminating the need for annual license testing.
Increased testing requirements Linking Words
also
burden officers, whose salaries are funded by taxpayer money. With the introduction of regular driving assessments, employees in the transport bureau must thoroughly verify that participants meet the requirements. Linking Words
This
results in an increased workload for staff, yet Linking Words
this
protocol does not correlate with a reduction in road safety risks. In fact, authorities in our country have mandated that drivers retake driving tests more frequently in recent years, but Linking Words
this
has not led to a decrease in the likelihood of car accidents.
In conclusion, requiring the same driving test every year wastes citizens' time and money without effectively addressing street safety issues. Linking Words
Additionally
, Linking Words
the
excessive testing places significant burdens on officers, which does not serve as a primary method to prevent tragedies for pedestrians. Correct article usage
apply
Thus
, I cannot fully support the idea that annual driving examinations should be implemented to reduce car crashes.Linking Words
rajputshivani227