Some people think that the best way to improve road transport safety is to let the deiver test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the ideal method for improving roadway safety is to require drivers to undergo an annual driving examination.
This
essay will disagree with that view and discuss how such
a requirement causes inconvenience for drivers and imposes high costs on the traffic department.
The necessity for frequent appointments due to
driving tests forces motorists to waste time and money on retaking an exam. Moreover
, traffic rules remain largely consistent, making it unnecessary to repeatedly verify a driver's understanding of these regulations. Instead
, the focus should be on implementing efficient ways to penalize those who violate the rules. For example
, Singapore's stringent fines for traffic violations effectively reduce the incidence of car accidents, eliminating the need for annual license testing.
Increased testing requirements also
burden officers, whose salaries are funded by taxpayer money. With the introduction of regular driving assessments, employees in the transport bureau must thoroughly verify that participants meet the requirements. This
results in an increased workload for staff, yet this
protocol does not correlate with a reduction in road safety risks. In fact, authorities in our country have mandated that drivers retake driving tests more frequently in recent years, but this
has not led to a decrease in the likelihood of car accidents.
In conclusion, requiring the same driving test every year wastes citizens' time and money without effectively addressing street safety issues. Additionally
, the
excessive testing places significant burdens on officers, which does not serve as a primary method to prevent tragedies for pedestrians. Correct article usage
apply
Thus
, I cannot fully support the idea that annual driving examinations should be implemented to reduce car crashes.Submitted by rajputshivani227 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Although the essay provides a complete response, consider offering a more balanced viewpoint by acknowledging potential benefits of annual testing before presenting the final disagreement. This can enhance the depth of the analysis.
task achievement
Your use of examples is relevant and specific. To strengthen your response, you might include a brief discussion on alternative measures for improving road safety that do not involve annual tests.
coherence cohesion
The logical structure is excellent, but ensure each paragraph explicitly links back to the main thesis to reinforce the argument throughout.
task achievement
The introduction presents a clear stance, setting the stage effectively for the essay's argument.
coherence cohesion
Coherence and cohesion are well-maintained with clear progression and logical paragraph transitions.
coherence cohesion
Conclusion effectively summarizes the argument while reinforcing the writer's viewpoint.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?