It is often said that governments spend too much money on project to protect wildlife, while there are other problems that are more important? Do you agree or disagree?

There is an ongoing debate about whether
governments
allocate excessive funds to
wildlife
conservation
at the expense of addressing more pressing societal issues.
While
it is true that nations face numerous challenges, I disagree with the view that
wildlife
protection is a misallocation of resources.
Instead
, I believe that investing in
wildlife
preservation has both immediate and long-term benefits that support broader environmental stability, which is essential for addressing other critical issues.
Firstly
,
wildlife
conservation
is integral to maintaining ecological balance, which directly impacts human well-being. Ecosystems provide vital services,
such
as clean air, water purification, and pollination, which are fundamental to agriculture and public health.
For example
, the preservation of forests and wetlands helps regulate
climate
patterns and reduces the frequency of natural disasters like floods and droughts. By protecting biodiversity,
governments
indirectly safeguard their citizens against environmental catastrophes that would
otherwise
incur massive economic and social costs.
Thus
, rather than detracting from other priorities,
wildlife
conservation
supports foundational aspects of human survival and economic stability.
Furthermore
,
wildlife
conservation
is essential for combating
climate
change, an issue that transcends national boundaries and demands global cooperation. Many species play crucial roles in carbon sequestration;
for instance
, rainforests and ocean ecosystems absorb vast amounts of carbon dioxide, helping to mitigate global warming. If
governments
reduce their investment in these areas, it could undermine efforts to achieve long-term
climate
targets, ultimately worsening social and economic issues associated with
climate
change.
Therefore
, the money spent on protecting
wildlife
is an investment in achieving sustainable development goals, benefiting both the environment and society. In conclusion,
while
governments
must address multiple societal challenges, I believe that
wildlife
conservation
is an essential area of spending. Protecting biodiversity and ecosystems underpins environmental health, supports
climate
mitigation, and ultimately sustains human life. Far from being an unnecessary expenditure,
wildlife
protection is a vital and forward-thinking investment that addresses core global challenges, justifying the funds allocated to it.
Submitted by alyalihan28 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Response
While the essay provides a strong argument, consider incorporating more specific examples to support your points. For instance, naming particular species or projects could strengthen your argument about wildlife conservation's global benefits.
Coherence and Cohesion
A bit more variety in transitional phrases could enhance the flow and demonstrate varied use of cohesive devices.
Task Response
The essay provides a clear and comprehensive response to the prompt, with a well-structured argument supporting wildlife conservation.
Introduction and Conclusion
The introduction effectively presents the main argument, and the conclusion neatly ties together the main points, reinforcing the position.
Logical Structure
The essay logically progresses from one point to the next, demonstrating strong coherence and cohesion.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • conservation efforts
  • biodiversity
  • ecosystem health
  • eco-tourism
  • environmental degradation
  • interconnectivity
  • inherently linked
  • quality of human life
  • effective government spending
  • complement each other
What to do next:
Look at other essays: