Wild animals have no use in the 21 century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree with question

Some people believe that training to preserve wildlife

this

century is unbeneficial and that money which is allocated to it yearly is unnecessary and does not make sense.

However

,

this

essay shows two aspects to consider to protect wild

animals

and why I consider their value to be remarkable.

Firstly

, every natural species will always have an ecological function. Many wild

animals

keep balance in different zones

such

as cleaning, and fertilizing areas for humans and domestic

animals

.

For instance

, rivers, forests, and lands are kept free from pests, litters, and herbs thanks to foxes, bears, crows and tigers.

Furthermore

, the soil is available to grow seeds and keep clearness their food security.

Secondly

, the diversity of healthy wildlife means possible profits for a

country

these days. Many

animals

are unique from a region or

country

,

consequently

, many travellers, researchers, and companies must travel to those countries to see them. Both local businesses and the

country

's economy could take advantage of them by providing shelters

while

they charge to visit them in the natural environment.

Moreover

, by preserving flora and fauna, a well-known

country

could get prizes and memorable awards.

To sum up

, by taking care of

animals

in the wild, a nation will achieve both boost their zone clearness and humans will make the most of their nourishment.

In addition

, they would

get

Verb problem

be

show examples

vital for having uncommon species which are valued in the époque.

As a result

, they would make money as many animal lovers would be down to preserve all fauna. From my point of view, any type of animal is important in the natural chain of life and we depend on each other. We must ensure they are all valued.