Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Original artists ought to have the right to show their pieces of
art
while
the authorities or society should not limit their artistic expression. I totally agree with this
point of view since art
plays a crucial role in well-being
of the general public and suppression of artistic expression leads to the stifling of freedom which negatively impacts society.
Add an article
the well-being
First,
the arts are essential to a healthy society as it pushes people away from high-paced life, allowing them to relax from the overwhelming pressure of life. When individuals are particularly interested in certain arts whether it is literature, performing art
or visual art
, they can convey their way of thinking by creating masterpieces which enrich our lives thus
turning monotonous times into magical experiences. For example
, a lot of people who enjoy going in for arts always have a positive mindset as a result
low rates of anxiety and stress. Therefore
, what should do the government
in order to have peace among the public is encourage creative artists to do their work with great pleasure.
Second,
limiting artistic expression can lead to the stifling of peoples' freedom due to
the fact that every person has the right to choose their path and behaviour in the circle of law. If the government
confines peoples' conduct to make something creative or think out of the box, it will lead to dissatisfaction among citizens thus
worsening the country's democracy. This
is because artists tend to deliver a harsh reality of a nation through their work which will evoke inspiration to change it for the better in the person experiencing this
injustice. To illustrate, the musicians who brought out the truth of serious issues through their pieces of music underwent strict censorship by the government
, showing their lack of democracy and justice which reduced the government'
credibility.
In conclusion, artistic creation should not be confined by the general public or Change noun form
government's
government'
censorship as it destroys the relationship between residents and the Change noun form
government
government
, making real life monotonous and reserved.Submitted by almirasartayeva on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
clear comprehensive ideas
Some sentences could be clearer. Consider restructuring complex sentences for better comprehension.
relevant specific examples
Include more specific examples or references to well-known instances where artistic freedom positively or negatively impacted society.
introduction conclusion present
The introduction and conclusion effectively set the stage and summarize the argument convincingly, maintaining reader engagement throughout.
complete response
The essay provides a complete response to the task, addressing both the importance of artistic freedom and the potential impacts of restrictions.
logical structure
Logical structure is maintained with a clear progression of ideas from introduction to conclusion.