Governments should focus their spending on public services rather than on the art (e.g. Music and painting). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued that spending money on public

services

is more important than spending on arts.I strongly agree with

this

declaration that the

Government

should make public

services

better. To comment with the agreement that public

services

such

as public transport and housing societies should be focused on by the

government

.

In other words

, these

services

are very important for the prosperity and well-being of the public.

Additionally

, it will reduce inequality in the communities so everyone will have

chance

Add an article

a chance

the chance

show examples

of equal income in

this

way.

however

, the economy of the country will grow by spending on these

services

.

For example

, opening more hospitals will provide better treatments and facilities for patients and will give opportunities to low-income individuals.

Thus

, the difference in social class will be removed by

government

spending on public

services

. Moving toward the other side of the argument that

art

is as much important as public

services

so,

art

is a part of our traditions like painting and music.It is the prestige of one country to secure its traditions and values.

while

these traditions transfer from generation to generation to save cultural values.

On the other hand

, it

also

benefits the communities by developing a sense of belonging so people from different societies come together, share their ideas and communicate with each other.

For instance

, in FINLAND, 91% of the total expenditures the

government

spends on

art

.

Therefore

, the

government

should spend on

art

to enhance the dignity of the country.

To sum up

,

government

should spend on both public

services

as well as

on

art

but focusing on public

services

is essential to make people's lives easier.