Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

It's argued that

government

Correct article usage

the government

show examples

should invest in

railways

instead

of roads. Some people could think that

railways

are essential,

while

others may believe

otherwise

. I completely agree with

this

point of view, because rail lines are more environmentally friendly and they could prevent

traffic

congestion. Funding

railways

can provide green travel. Primarily, investing in underground or tram lines could reduce carbon emissions.

For instance

, if politicians invest in subways or trains, people will use more frequently public transportation.

furthermore

, better and wider transportation services could reduce the number of commuters who drive to work. An organized transportation system could cut down the

traffic

jams. since more tram and subway lines will be available the number of cars that driven for no reason on the streets and highways is going to be lower.

in addition

, trains have a higher capacity rather than private vehicles.

also

, they can carry a large number of passengers in a shorter time rather than private transport.

therefore

,

according to

the mentioned cases, people can save time and the

traffic

will be reduced during rush hours.

To sum up

, the state should invest in

railways

instead

of roads because better services encourage eco-friendly travel, and they play a crucial role in the amount of

traffic

on the streets.