It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at en early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this dictinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is an ongoing debate over whether

punishment

should be in order to recognise what is true and false at an early age. Many individuals claim that the penalty is crucial to aid them in

distinct

Replace the word

distinguishing

show examples

differences from the truth. At the same time, I mostly agree with

this

point of view. Admittedly, opponents of

punishment

argue that it does not have a long-term effect on young people. If parents penalize their

children

due to

their wrong actions, it results in a short-term impact that

children

are not aware of what they do incorrectly.

Additionally

,

punishment

might lead to the hiding of the incident done by

children

.

In other words

, they tend to tell a lie about their acts, since

children

are afraid of the penalty and its certain consequences.

Nevertheless

, chastisement is the best method to teach a child what is wrong or true.

In other words

, when they face

punishment

after wrongful events, they are able to remember it and not repeat those actions.

For example

, pupils bully the vulnerable ones among them in almost every country, after the school authorities chastise certain pupils, resulting to learn their wrong actions. Apart from that, it may be beneficial in the

children

's future

further

life in order to prevent them from making mistakes.

For example

,

children

grow and become individuals within society, and

as a result

; they pass these behaviours to their

children

. In conclusion,

although

the penalty might not significant method in order to study

children

's errors, I am of the opinion that

punishment

can teach

children

the difference between mistakes and truth.