The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the variety of transport which
were
used to commute either to or from work in one city in Europe from 1960 to 2000.
Correct subject-verb agreement
was
It is clear that
in 1960, the most popular was walking, Linking Words
whereas
Linking Words
by
2000, most trips were conducted by car. Bikes were used slightly less frequently. Notably, buses were utilised quite often throughout the whole period.
Focusing first on walking and riding bikes, in 1960, nearly 35% of people were travelling on foot, Add the comma(s)
, by
while
for bike riders Linking Words
this
figure was 10% lower. During the following years, the percentage of travelling on foot dropped drastically, with nearly 15% in 1980 and less than 10% in 2000. As for bikes, in 1980, 20% of work trips were done using them, and only approximately 5% - in 2000.
Regarding bus and car trips, between 15% and 20% of citizens used them in 1960. In 2000, the figure was almost the same. Notably, the peak of travelling by bus we can see in 1980, with more than 25% of commuters. With respect to cars, only 5% of citizens went to work using their private vehicles. Linking Words
However
, between 1980 and 2000, their use increased sharply, with almost 25% and 35% of travellers, respectively.Linking Words
Submitted by halynasmyk953 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Vocabulary: The word "figure" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "figure" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "nearly" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "almost" was used 2 times.
▼