Some people think that companies and individuals should pay to clear up the pollution they produce and that the government should not pay for it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Paying amounts of
money
either by
individuals
or
governments
through cleaning up
pollution
has been a vital topic of debate.
While
some
individuals
believe that people and factories should pay
money
to approach
this
trend, I strongly believe that
governments
need to investigate amounts of
money
geared towards decreasing
pollution
, which will be discussed by compelling reasons. First of all, these days,
due to
various reasons
such
as the increase in both populations and numerous industries, we are faced with a variety of environmental challenges including
pollution
, particularly air
pollution
, So these kinds of
pollution
lead to significant harmful consequences. A prime illustration of
this
is the dramatic increase in rates of dangerous diseases
such
as cancer and heart attacks.
Moreover
, it is avoidable to ban
pollution
completely.
However
, if
governments
have struggled to devote sufficient budget, these kinds of
pollution
contribute to causing detrimental effects for both societies and
individuals
as a whole.
Therefore
, it is crucial to devote sufficient budget in order to
decrease
these negative effects gradually.
On the other hand
, it is high time that these challenges need to be addressed and solved.
In other words
,
governments
and agencies should adopt efficient measures to
decrease
the amount of
pollution
produced by
individuals
and companies.
For instance
, the increase in personal vehicles has resulted in air
pollution
over the years.
Thus
, if
governments
exert an effort to enhance public transportation, the rates of using personal cars would
decrease
dramatically. Despite avoidable increasing
pollution
,
governments
need to take excessive amounts of budget for effective solutions,
such
as improving public transportation to alleviate detrimental consequences. In conclusion,
while
there are different opinions about investing
money
to
decrease
pollution
, I firmly believe that
this
urgent issue needs to be addressed by
governments
.
Moreover
,
governments
can implement efficient policies, which not only could
decrease
pollution
but can
also
lead to sustainable effective solutions.
Submitted by eskandari.mahanz66 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Clarify the introduction to make the stance clearer to avoid ambiguity.
task response
Provide specific examples or data to strengthen the main points.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each paragraph has a clear main idea and link it effectively with connectors to other ideas for improved flow.
coherence cohesion
Your essay presents a well-structured argument.
coherence cohesion
There is a clear introduction and conclusion, providing a frame for your argument.
task response
The main points are well-supported, maintaining relevance throughout the essay.

Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS

Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Polluter Pays Principle
  • corporate accountability
  • economic incentives
  • conscious consumption
  • waste management
  • environmental damage
  • green technologies
  • financial responsibility
  • sustainable practices
  • government funds
What to do next:
Look at other essays:

Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+

Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.
Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!