Some people think that the best way to resolve environmental problems is to increase fuel and vehicles price. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?

It is argued that the prices of fossil

fuels

and

cars

should be increased to address environmental issues. I do agree with that statement, which will be described below. It is my view that

people

are more likely to

use

private vehicles for transportation which contributes to pollution in urban areas. So increasing fuel prices may encourage commuters to

use

public transport

such

as metro trains and buses to save money.

For instance

, in Turkey, the high price of

fuels

Fix the agreement mistake

fuel

show examples

leads individuals to

use

public transportation.

Moreover

,

this

strategy can have a significant impact not only on drivers but

also

on companies that produce carbon emissions, and they may be encouraged to

use

renewable

energy

sources

such

as wind or solar power

instead

of fossil

fuels

, which are more environmentally friendly.

In contrast

, some

people

claim that enhancing the price of fuel is an ineffective strategy since some

people

may

use

private

cars

despite the higher costs. They firmly insist that governments should raise public awareness about the consequences of emitting carbon dioxide in the environment to motivate

people

to

use

renewable

energy

sources or public transportation. I do not find

this

argument convincing as individuals often prefer the comfort of private

cars

, even when they are aware of the negative impact on the environment. In conclusion, I completely agree with raising the cost of fuel and

cars

because when

people

face financial difficulties, they will choose other ways to commute,

such

as buses, trains, and bicycles.

Although

they will be encouraged to choose renewable

energy

like solar

energy

rather than

fuels

.