Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish.

Thanks to the internet, these days

experts

find it easy to apply for a job in another

country

.

However

,

while

some

people

believe that they should

work

in the

country

where they graduated from, and others say that they must be free to immigrate, I am of an

opinion

between the ideas, and after explaining two sides I will bring my

opinion

at the end

of

this

essay. The reason some

people

argue that professionals must be forbidden from immigrating to other nations after studying in their

country

is that they are concerned about its consequences, and believe that have the right to receive services from these

experts

. They ratiocinate, especially in countries with free education and low low-salary,

experts

could

study

at universities that are run with taxes paid by

people

,

therefore

graduate once must

work

for that nation, and

also

instead

of that they will be faced with a lack of

experts

work

-force in the near future.

In contrast

, others of the

idea

that

experts

must be free to choose their workplace, and they support the

idea

for several reasons. First of all, choosing a workplace is everyone's right and must not take it.

Secondly

, limiting

experts

' immigration just decreases motivation to

study

these hard subjects and

this

results in a significant decline in the quality of graduates

due to

accepting students in important faculty without hard competition. I am of an

opinion

between these ideas, which is run in Iran my

country

as a regulation for

experts

with the name of the scheme, that everyone who studied in universities should

work

for the sake of the public as the same duration of their

study

to get their certificate and be free to immigrate with that or stay and

work

. In conclusion, the first group's

idea

is that graduates must stay and do duty because of

study

in the

country

's universities runs on

people

's taxes, and the second group's

idea

is that forbidding students is not right because

this

results in low motivation to

study

students are correct to somehow and with the scheme law which student must

work

as the same duration of their

study

in the

country

where they graduate in my

opinion

would be complete.