Technology is becoming progressively universal. In the fullness of time, classroom teachers will be totally substituted for technology. Do you agree or disagree?
In
this
modern world, the integration of technology is continuously accelerating. Even classrooms are among the numerous environments that leverage the advantages of technological advancements. However
, the notion that classroom
teachers
will be entirely supplanted by technology is fundamentally flawed. This
essay will examine the inability of technology to enforce discipline in students
and the inherent limitations it presents in facilitating effective learning, thereby affirming this
position.
Firstly
, an artificial intelligence-driven robotic teacher would lack the requisite authority and oversight to maintain discipline among classroom
students
. For instance
, it is well-established that children require vigilant supervision from their educators to ensure they remain engaged with their academic tasks and refrain from distractions during lessons. Unfortunately, this
essential function is beyond the capabilities of robotic teachers
. Consequently
, it becomes evident that classroom
instructors will never be entirely replaced by technological substitutes.
Secondly
, the learning process of students
would be significantly hindered under the instruction of robotic teachers
, as it may impede some students
' ability to fully assimilate the material presented. For example
, children thrive on encouragement and emotional engagement, which are pivotal to their motivation and comprehension. While
human educators excel in fostering this
environment, robotic teachers
are devoid of such
interpersonal qualities. Thus
, it is clear that
the absence of human interaction would disrupt the educational experience, rendering robotic teachers
inadequate.
In conclusion, robotic teachers
lack the essential attributes to effectively enforce discipline and actively hinder students
’ capacity to grasp new concepts. Therefore
, the proposition of entirely automating classroom
teaching is untenable and cannot be endorsed.Submitted by azami06mufa on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While you have provided relevant examples, try to add more specific evidence or instances where technology has been unable to replace teachers completely. This would strengthen your argument even further.
task achievement
Consider addressing the opposing viewpoint briefly to create a more comprehensive discussion. Highlighting any potential advantages of technology in classrooms would give a balanced view before reinforcing your stance.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that each paragraph transitions smoothly to enhance the overall coherence of your essay. Consider using transitional phrases or words to connect ideas more seamlessly.
coherence cohesion
Your essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, aligning well with the main argument. This provides a solid framework for the reader.
coherence cohesion
You have structured your essay logically, systematically presenting your points in a clear and understandable way.
coherence cohesion
Your main points are generally well-supported, and the argument against robotic teachers is effectively made through logical reasoning.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?