Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Over recent years, more and more people have been attending discussions as regards to expenditure directions of states. Most people say states should spend their budget on more beneficial fields,

such

as education, agriculture, industry and so on,

instead

of the

arts

. I tend to both agree and disagree with the given idea for some plausible reasons. On the one hand, I disagree with the idea that government spending on the

arts

is a waste of money because the

arts

preserve and promote cultural heritage. Paintings, music, and theatre are a nation’s traditions and values, helping future generations understand their history and identity.

For example

, government-funded museums and cultural festivals often attract tourists, boosting local economies and generating revenue.

On the other hand

, from my point of view, the states should invest in more beneficial majors than the

arts

because of their incomes.

Moreover

, industry, agriculture, and education, not only those, but

also

some projects which are relevant for the welfare of society have more economic advantages, and increase life expectancy or standards etc.

For example

, if people eat organic and healthy food which is stimulated by the government, they will have more well-being

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

and higher life conditions. Meanwhile, the power of regimes consists of industrial poverty,

well

Correct word choice

and well

show examples

equipted

Correct your spelling

equipped

army, but the

arts

and

such

things are a kind of cultural richness. In conclusion, considering promoting cultural heritage features and the option of comprehensive and high life standards, I have come to the conclusion that I am approaching from a balanced view and the governments should distribute the budget fairly and strategically.