Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The global environmental crisis has become a pressing issue, leading some to suggest that increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles is
the
Correct article usage
a
show examples
viable solution. I fully disagree that it can solve the problems
due to
Linking Words
its effect on lower-income groups
as well as
Linking Words
its inability to address the broader causes of environmental degradation.
Firstly
Linking Words
, raising fuel prices would impact lower-income households, who often rely on affordable gas for their daily needs. Individuals, particularly in rural areas, lack access to public transport or alternative means of mobility, leaving them no choice but to bear the financial burden of increased fuel
costs
Use synonyms
.
This
Linking Words
example can be seen in the rural area of Pangandaran, which is home to many fishermen who depend on affordable gas to power their boats and sustain their livelihoods. A rise in oil prices would directly increase their operational
costs
Use synonyms
, making it harder for them to compete in markets and potentially driving them into financial hardship.
Thus
Linking Words
, policies that increase gas
costs
Use synonyms
could have unintended social and economic consequences, particularly for vulnerable groups who are already struggling to make ends meet.
Secondly
Linking Words
, increasing oil
costs
Use synonyms
does not tackle other critical sources of environmental damage,
such
Linking Words
as deforestation, industrial emissions, and excessive waste production. Even if fewer people used private vehicles, significant contributors to global pollution would remain unaddressed.
For example
Linking Words
, industries continue to emit large amounts of greenhouse gases, and the use of non-renewable energy in sectors like electricity generation still poses a significant threat to the environment.
To conclude
Linking Words
, I firmly believe that increasing gasoline prices will not help address the environmental problems, as it burdens lower-income citizens and fails to tackle the broader causes of environmental degradation.
Submitted by azami06mufa on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Ensure that your arguments are equally weighed; the second point about broader environmental issues could be expanded on more, potentially addressing other sources of pollution.
coherence cohesion
To enhance coherence, consider using more linking words that show contrast, sequence, or result to make the argument flow more smoothly.
coherence cohesion
The introduction clearly presents the writer's stance on the topic.
task achievement
The essay provides a specific example regarding the community of Pangandaran to support the argument about economic impact.
coherence cohesion
The conclusion effectively summarizes the main points, reinforcing the writer's position.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • environmental sustainability
  • renewable energy
  • fossil fuels
  • public transportation
  • carbon footprint
  • economic incentives
  • alternative energy vehicles
  • fuel-efficient
  • government subsidies
  • economic disparity
  • urban planning
  • rural infrastructure
  • sustainable development
  • carbon tax
  • green technology
  • demand elasticity
  • energy conservation
  • climate change mitigation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: