Nowadays, with the development of technology, it is not necessary to get products from animals anymore. I partly agree with
this
notion as in certain situations synthetic alternatives are not advanced enough to fully replace natural products.
On the one hand, humanity has developed significantly in recent decades, and many synthesis methods have been successfully investigated. Linking Words
Hence
the majority of essential goods are available without using flora and fauna Linking Words
such
as medicines, clothes, etc. Linking Words
For instance
, Linking Words
instead
of using natural silk or leather by killing Linking Words
the
animals, people create similar synthetic materials like artificial leather and viscose. Correct article usage
apply
Moreover
, these methods are more energy efficient compared to the traditional ways which is why individuals no longer need to exploit the environment.
Linking Words
However
, there are still a number of different spheres where artificial analogues are irrelevant as in premium fragrances and food production. Linking Words
This
is mostly because these industries require an essential quality of the ingredients added which can not be recreated by artificial technologies. To illustrate, many premium segment perfumes Linking Words
such
as Initio, Creed, Clive Christian, etc. still prefer to add amber into their perfumes to improve the sillage rather than artificial ambroxan which is not as effective as the original prototype in terms of fixating the aroma and having a special smell.
Linking Words
To conclude
, at present, people are able to copy almost any natural material so there is no need to collect them from nature. Linking Words
Nevertheless
, our methods of creating analogues are not perfect which is why some spheres prefer to exploit the traditional products.Linking Words
hhaha9102