The argument that some countries should permit the exploitation of natural resources
due to
the increasing demand for fossil fuels is a statement I strongly disagree with. I believe that the destruction of nature has significant negative impacts on both the environment and human life.
Linking Words
Firstly
, deforestation, particularly through massive tree chopping, has a devastating effect on wildlife. Many species lose their habitats, and their food sources are disrupted, leading to a decline in their populations or, in some cases, even extinction. Linking Words
For example
, in Kalimantan, particularly on Borneo Island, around 80% of the forest has been cleared for development, often without considering the long-term consequences. Linking Words
As a result
, the Borneo pygmy elephant, a species native to the region, has disappeared Linking Words
due to
human activities, Linking Words
such
as deforestation.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, Linking Words
although
humans are often the cause of environmental destruction, they too suffer from the consequences of their actions. Deforestation leaves the land barren, making it unable to absorb rainwater, which leads to erosion. Linking Words
For example
, in December 2024, a major landslide occurred in Brastagi, North Sumatra, blocking a vital road for almost a month. Linking Words
This
was caused by the absence of trees, which led to the destabilization of the soil. The disaster resulted in casualties and extensive delays in evacuation efforts, highlighting the serious impact that environmental degradation can have on human lives.
In conclusion, the exploitation of land for fossil fuels is a harmful idea, as it negatively affects the lives of many living creatures. The increasing demand for fossil fuels should not justify the destruction of the environment. It is crucial to recognize that sacrificing nature for short-term gain will have long-lasting, harmful consequences for both the planet and humanity.Linking Words
keepspirit