Some people argue whether we should follow the demand for some minerals and use undiscovered areas for all prices. I concur that we should not sacrifice our planet for economic purposes. In
this
essay, I will elaborate on Linking Words
this
issue and explain my point of view.
Linking Words
To begin
with, I disagree because it will damage nature. By digging in new areas we emit harmful substances and destroy natural constractions. I strongly believe we overuse the potential of our planet. Any change has its consequences Linking Words
such
as dying trees. Linking Words
Consequently
, flora and fauna get poorer and the area missing minerals. If we allow to access more resources, soon we will significantly decrease the number of untouched places.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, we do not need as many minerals as we use. I strongly believe we overuse the potential of our planet. Some scarce resources should not be accessed so easily. Linking Words
Therefore
, undiscovered areas should not be opened up to everyone and with no limits. Linking Words
For instance
, we should set strong regulations on how they can be used and by what parties. Governments should implement strict policies to prevent overexploitation and ensure sustainability.
Linking Words
To sum up
, there is a theory that aims to Linking Words
fulfill
the global demand for oil and gas Change the spelling
fulfil
through
accessing new promising locations. Change preposition
by
However
, Linking Words
such
a solution threatens the good of the environment and Linking Words
scarcity
of already limited resources. Correct article usage
the scarcity
This
exploitation could lead to irreversible damage, making it crucial to prioritize sustainable alternatives. Linking Words
That is
why, I strongly believe we should not do it.Linking Words
Aga