Long distance flight consumes the amount of fuel that a car uses for many years and pollutes the air. Some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourists travel, rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
It is widely acknowledged that long flights exhaust more resources than cars consume for an extended period and harm the
environment
Use synonyms
. Some assert that people should prioritize reducing the number of unnecessary flights,
such
Linking Words
as recreational
travel
Use synonyms
, over limiting car usage. I strongly disagree with
this
Linking Words
notion. First and foremost, one compelling argument supporting my stance is that recreational visits can contribute to a wide range of businesses in developed countries, which is an essential part of protecting the
environment
Use synonyms
. To clarify, in general, by allocating
tax
Use synonyms
funds
in
Change preposition
to
show examples
wealthy nations, society has preserved the quality of the air worldwide.
Thus
Linking Words
, the more people
us
Correct your spelling
use
show examples
transportation for
a
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
personal
travel
Use synonyms
, the more these nations are able to generate
tax
Use synonyms
revenue.
As a result
Linking Words
, they can reinvest more funds into preserving the
environment
Use synonyms
.
Therefore
Linking Words
, long flights can play a pivotal role in boosting
tax
Use synonyms
revenue and protecting the
environment
Use synonyms
.
Furthermore
Linking Words
,
while
Linking Words
some contend that regulating personal
travel
Use synonyms
abroad is advantageous for air pollution, it has the potential to pose a risk.
This
Linking Words
is because the number of world natural heritage sites is limited.
In addition
Linking Words
, the trip to
such
Linking Words
areas may offer fresh perspectives on nature and society, ultimately raising the awareness of natural preservation.
Moreover
Linking Words
, some countries do not have
such
Linking Words
assets.
Hence
Linking Words
, unlike regulating the use of cars, travelling abroad enables individuals to have these opportunities.
Therefore
Linking Words
, discouraging unnecessary
travel
Use synonyms
might eliminate enlightening opportunities to foster awareness of air pollution. In conclusion, I firmly disagree with
this
Linking Words
argument, since non-essential travelling can contribute to developing individuals' interests in environmental issues and boost
tax
Use synonyms
revenue for preserving nature.
Moreover
Linking Words
, straightforwardly limiting car usage would struggle to offer these benefits.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence
Your arguments need further development with clearer connections between points
task achievement
Make sure to provide specific examples or deeper insights to support your claims
coherence
Clear position taken in the introduction and conclusion, which helps in framing the argument
task achievement
Identifies the economic benefits of tourism and its relation to environmental preservation, which is a unique perspective
Topic Vocabulary:
  • carbon emissions
  • climate change
  • air pollution
  • sustainable future
  • carbon footprint
  • regulating
  • passenger transportation
  • virtual tourism
  • domestic economies
  • equitable climate policies
  • non-essential flights
  • tourism-related travel
  • environmental crisis
  • long-distance travel
  • pollution levels
What to do next:
Look at other essays: